Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Karnataka Premier League cricket sports

Karnataka Premier League goes pink


Bangalore: Twenty20 cricket is all about innovation. We have seen batsmen playing improvised shots like the Dilscoop and bowlers bowling the slow bouncer. We have seen commentators on the field of play as opposed to being confined to the studio. We now have players in dug-outs on the field as opposed to sitting in the dressing rooms. And now...we have the Pink Ball!

http://static.cricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/CMS/117600/117680.jpg

The Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) has decided to use the pink ball for the upcoming Mantri Karnataka Premier League T20 tournament. This will be the first time that the pink ball will be used in an official cricket match in India. The KSCA in its endeavour to innovate will be assisting the cricket regulatory authority by providing a fair assessment of the pink ball.

On the decision to introduce Pink Ball, Mr.Brijesh Patel, Honorary Secretary, KSCA, said, "We are happy to take a pioneering step to use and test the Pink Ball in Mantri KPL II. The teams have started practicing with it and are now geared up for a challenging tournament."

http://cdn.wn.com/pd/fb/c3/c879a822732ea9d5e006ced3092a_grande.jpg

For the Mantri KPL Season II, KSCA has specially imported Dukes balls from England.

Syed Kirmani, former Indian wicket-keeper, is all for experimentation: "It is a good idea to experiment with the pink ball this KPL. There is no harm in trying it out to see how it performs."

Stuart Binny, Bijapur Bulls, who bowled with the pink ball during the IPL practice sessions for Mumbai Indians this year, says "It is a good idea to use the pink ball in Mantri KPL this year. If it works well and the players are satisfied with it then they could even start using it in IPL."

http://www.instablogsimages.com/images/2009/08/06/kumble-grimaces_ludpY_17022.jpg

The pink ball may provide an option of playing Test Cricket on a Day-Night basis and thereby encourage more spectators to watch Test matches. The pink ball will also retain the visibility longer than the white ball as players constantly complain about the white ball getting dirty and difficult to sight in the latter stages of a One-day game.

According to Roger Binny, former India medium-pacer, the pink ball will be a welcome change. He says, "It is a step in the right direction. We have to make changes that will make the game more comfortable for the players. The pink ball doesn't pick up much dirt unlike the white ball which gets difficult to sight. It is the ball of the future."

As the excitement for the use of Pink Ball is building up for players, it is certain that this year the competition is much stiffer, making it an exciting season of cricket gaming.

http://www.instablogsimages.com/images/2009/08/13/rahul-miffed_q2YaI_17022.jpg

Cricket commentator Charu Sharma says. "The pink ball experiment has been necessitated by seeking better visibility as the white ball tends to get dirty very soon while trials with the pink ball have shown that the effects of wear and tear tend to show much slower on the pink ball".

The authorities may wish to keep an eye on the proceedings of the tournament to monitor the practicability and performance of the pink ball. It certainly is worth trying and if the ICC is satisfied with the performance of the pink ball, we may soon get to watch Test cricket played under lights, which will provide the much needed revival for the game. With Mantri KPL II, KSCA could very well take credit for pioneering this revival.

New Zealand urged at World Cup news

New Zealand urged to be fearless at World Cup

McCullum's decision not to keep wickets in Test cricket anymore underlines the fearless approach that he is seeking to instill in his teammates

http://cdn.wn.com/ph/img/f3/1c/290d85678ad6c2b52f296eb553fd-grande.jpg

Dubai: New Zealand's dashing wicketkeeper-batsman Brendon McCullum has urged his team to be fearless at the ICC Cricket World Cup 2011.

"If we get too scared to see if we're good enough or not, we won't finish anywhere. When that time comes to make this a great team, even though it may not seem like that at the moment, whether we take it or not, that comes down to whether we're hard enough," he said after winning honours at the annual awards night of New Zealand Cricket (NZC).

http://cdn.wn.com/ph/img/e3/78/3464e3a0aa1cffa0efc1c01e7f39-grande.jpg

His decision not to keep wickets in Test cricket anymore — knowing fully well the risks that come with it — underlines the fearless approach that he is seeking to instill in his teammates.

In a report quoted on the International Cricket Council (ICC) website, McCullum said: "This has no side-door options for me. It's a gutsy call; it could be the worst call I've made in my career.

"You go from being one of the major certainties in the team to now being in the mix and being relatively unproven. It's a huge challenge and hopefully it'll be the right decision," said McCullum of his fears.

Strong performances

McCullum had one of the most fruitful seasons with bat in 2009-10, but it was the fact that he was not vice-captain any more that stirred him.

http://s3.hubimg.com/u/2353478_f520.jpg

"I was lucky enough to put it all behind me and have the best season throughout my career. I'm confident I'm heading in the right direction and don't need a title to contribute to my team," he summed up.

McCullum returns to national duties in October during the Bangladesh tour following a paternity break during which he celebrated the birth of his nine-week old daughter.

ICC proposing series of radical recommendations


ICC proposing series of radical recommendations, including Test and ODI leagues



CAPE TOWN, South Africa — The first world cricket Test champion will be crowned in 2013 under radical proposals by the International Cricket Council on Tuesday.

http://www.thegoogly.com/images/2008/04/07/icc.jpg

Cricket's governing body is looking to provide a context to all Test matches by recommending the introduction of a four-year league that will culminate in a champion from a four-team playoff. The first playoff series is planned to take place in three years' time.

A one-day league, running from 2011-14 and separate from the 50-over Cricket World Cup, has also been recommended in a series of far-reaching proposals put forward for consideration to the ICC board by its Chief Executives' Committee (CEC), after two days of talks in Cape Town.
http://cricket.deepthi.com/images/dravid-100.jpg
"The holistic set of proposals, especially introducing more meaningful context, means we now have the potential to follow international cricket that is even more exciting," ICC chief executive Haroon Lorgat said.

"Protecting and promoting all three formats at international level is viable and I believe the CEC has shown itself to be forward thinking in tackling the challenges."

The ICC is looking to create more interest in Test cricket, which has a world rankings but no definitive championship. Results are therefore often viewed in isolation and without an overall context.

A 50-over World Cup has been running since 1975 while the first World Twenty20 was played in 2007. Test-match crowds have dwindled, with Twenty20 cricket proving more popular.

"Restructuring international cricket is a significant strategic challenge and one that must be dealt with," Lorgat said.

http://www.business-standard.com/general/video/img/video231006.jpg

Other recommendations include a change in the number of teams competing in the Cricket World Cup and the World Twenty20, and the introduction of Twenty20 rankings.

The executive committee is recommending a 10-team format in the World Cup from 2015, a reduction of four compared to the 2011 tournament when there will 14 teams competing in co-hosts India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

The number of countries playing in the World Twenty20 would increase from 12 to 16 teams if the proposals are ratified.

cricket world cup news

Cricket World Cup

The Cricket World Cup is the premier international championship of men's One Day International (ODI) cricket. The event is organised by the sport's governing body, the International Cricket Council (ICC), with preliminary qualification rounds leading up to a finals tournament which is held every four years. The tournament is the world's fourth largest and most viewed sporting event.[1][2][2] According to the ICC, it is the most important tournament and the pinnacle of achievement in the sport.[3][4] The first Cricket World Cup contest was organised in England in 1975. A separate Women's Cricket World Cup has been held every four years since 1973.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Cricket_World_Cup_trophy.jpg

The finals of the Cricket World Cup are contested by all ten Test-playing and ODI-playing nations, together with other nations that qualify through the World Cup Qualifier. Australia has been the most successful of the five teams to have won the tournament, taking four titles. The West Indies have won twice, while India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka have each won once.

http://www.kayaksurfworldcup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Cricket-World-Cup-2011.jpg

The 2007 Cricket World Cup matches were held between 13 March and 28 April 2007, in the West Indies. The 2007 tournament had sixteen teams competing in a pool stage (played in round-robin format), then a "super 8" stage, followed by semi-finals and a final. Australia defeated Sri Lanka in the final to retain the championship.

Before the first Cricket World Cup

The first ever international cricket match was played between Canada and the United States, on the 24 and 25 September 1844. However, the first credited Test match was played in 1877 between Australia and England, and the two teams competed regularly for The Ashes in subsequent years. South Africa was admitted to Test status in 1889.[5] Representative cricket teams were selected to tour each other, resulting in bilateral competition. Cricket was also included as an Olympic sport at the 1900 Paris Games, where Great Britain defeated France to win the gold medal.[6] This was the only appearance of cricket at the Summer Olympics.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/cricket/1999/world_cup/news/1999/06/20/pakistan_mourns/lg_akram_ap.jpg

The first multilateral competition at international level was the 1912 Triangular Tournament, a Test cricket tournament played in England between all three Test-playing nations at the time: England, Australia and South Africa. The event was not a success: the summer was exceptionally wet, making play difficult on damp uncovered pitches, and attendances were poor, attributed to a "surfeit of cricket".[7] In subsequent years, international Test cricket has been generally been organised as bilateral series: a multilateral Test tournament was not organised again until the quadrangular Asian Test Championship in 1999.

The number of nations playing Test cricket increased gradually over the years, with the addition of West Indies in 1928, New Zealand in 1930, India in 1932, and Pakistan in 1952, but international cricket continued to be played as bilateral Test matches over three, four or five days.

In the early 1960s, English county cricket teams began playing a shortened version of cricket which only lasted for one day. Starting in 1962 with a four-team knockout competition known as the Midlands Knock-Out Cup,[8] and continuing with the inaugural Gillette Cup in 1963, one-day cricket grew in popularity in England. A national Sunday League was formed in 1969. The first One-Day International event was played on the fifth day of a rain-aborted Test match between England and Australia at Melbourne in 1971, to fill the time available and as compensation for the frustrated crowd. It was a forty over match with eight balls per over.[9]

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/152/431255039_72ba507f0b_o.jpg

The success and popularity of the domestic one-day competitions in England and other parts of the world, as well as the early One-Day Internationals, prompted the ICC to consider organising a Cricket World Cup.

Prudential World Cups

The inaugural Cricket World Cup was hosted in 1975 by England, the only nation able to put forward the resources to stage an event of such magnitude at that time. The 1975 tournament started on June 7.[11] The first three events were held in England and officially known as the Prudential Cup after the sponsors Prudential plc. The matches consisted of 60 six-ball overs per team, played during the daytime in traditional form, with the players wearing cricket whites and using red cricket balls.[12]

http://en.academic.ru/pictures/enwiki/80/Prudential_Cup.jpg

Eight teams participated in the first tournament: Australia, England, the West Indies, New Zealand, India, and Pakistan (the six Test nations at the time), together with Sri Lanka and a composite team from East Africa.[13] One notable omission was South Africa, who were banned from international cricket due to apartheid. The tournament was won by the West Indies, who defeated Australia by 17 runs in the final at Lord's.[13]

http://grsmarketing.com.au/images/1983%20Prudential%20World%20Cup.jpg

The 1979 World Cup saw the introduction of the ICC Trophy competition to select non-Test playing teams for the World Cup,[14] with Sri Lanka and Canada qualifying.[15] West Indies won a second consecutive World Cup tournament, defeating the hosts, England, by 92 runs in the final. At a meeting which followed the World Cup, the International Cricket Conference agreed to make the competition a quadrennial event.[15]

The 1983 event was hosted by England for a third consecutive time. By this time, Sri Lanka had become a Test-playing nation, and Zimbabwe qualified through the ICC Trophy. A fielding circle was introduced, 30 yards (27 m) away from the stumps. Four fieldsmen needed to be inside it at all times.[16] India, an outsider quoted at 66-1 to win by bookmakers before the competition began, were crowned champions after upsetting the West Indies by 43 runs in the final.

1987–1996

The 1987 tournament, named the Reliance World Cup after their Indian sponsors, was held in India and Pakistan, the first time that the competition was held outside England. The games were reduced from 60 to 50 overs per innings, the current standard, because of the shorter daylight hours in the Indian subcontinent compared with England's summer.[18] Australia won the championship by defeating England by 7 runs in the final, the closest margin in World Cup final history.[19][20]

The 1992 World Cup, held in Australia and New Zealand, introduced many changes to the game, such as coloured clothing, white balls, day/night matches, and an alteration to the fielding restrictions. The South African cricket team participated in the event for the first time, following the fall of the apartheid regime and the end of the international sports boycott.[21] Pakistan overcame a dismal start to emerge as winners, defeating England by 22 runs in the final.[22]

The 1996 championship was held in the Indian subcontinent for a second time, with the inclusion of Sri Lanka as host for some of its group stage matches.[23] In the semi-final, Sri Lanka, heading towards a crushing victory over India at Eden Gardens (Calcutta) after their hosts lost eight wickets while scoring 120 runs in pursuit of 254, were awarded victory by default after riots broke out in protest against the Indian performance.[24] Sri Lanka went on to win their maiden championship by defeating Australia by seven wickets in the final, which was held in Lahore.
Australian treble

Qualification

In 1999 the event was hosted by England, with some matches also being held in Scotland, Ireland, Wales and the Netherlands.[26][27] Australia qualified for the semi-finals after reaching their target in their Super 6 match against South Africa off the final over of the match.[28] They then proceeded to the final with a tied match in the semi-final (also against South Africa) where a mix-up between South African batsmen Lance Klusener and Allan Donald saw Donald drop his bat and stranded mid-pitch to be run out. In the final, Australia dismissed Pakistan for 132 and then reached the target in less than 20 overs, with eight wickets in hand.
http://egypt.worldcupblog.org/files/2008/10/trophy-world-cup1.jpg
South Africa, Zimbabwe and Kenya hosted the 2003 World Cup. The number of teams participating in the event increased from twelve to fourteen. Kenya's victories over Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe, among others — and a forfeit by the New Zealand team, which refused to play in Kenya because of security concerns — enabled Kenya to reach the semi-finals, the best result by an associate. In the final, Australia made 359 runs for the loss of two wickets, the largest ever total in a final, defeating India by 125 runs.[30][31]

In 2007 the tournament was hosted by the West Indies; the Cricket World Cup became the first such tournament to be hosted on all six populated continents.[32] Bangladesh progressed to the second round for the first time, after defeating India, and they later went on to defeat South Africa in the second round.[33] Ireland making their World Cup debut tied with Zimbabwe and defeated Pakistan to progress to the second round, where they went on to defeating Bangladesh to get promoted to the main ODI table.[34] Following their defeat to Ireland, the Pakistani coach Bob Woolmer was found dead in his hotel room; it was later found out that he died of heart failure,[35] though his death may not have been a direct result of the match's outcome. Australia defeated Sri Lanka in the final by 53 runs (D/L), in farcical light conditions, extending their undefeated run in the World Cup to 29 matches and winning three straight World Cups.

The Test-playing nations qualify automatically for the World Cup main event, while the other teams have to qualify through a series of preliminary qualifying tournaments. The One Day International playing nations automatically enter the final qualification tournament, the World Cup Qualifier, along with other nations who have qualified through separate competitions.

Qualifying tournaments were introduced for the second World Cup, where two of the eight places in the finals were awarded to the leading teams in the ICC Trophy.[14] The number of teams selected through the ICC Trophy has varied throughout the years; currently, six teams are selected for the Cricket World Cup. The World Cricket League (administered by the International Cricket Council) is the qualification system provided to allow the Associate and Affiliate members of the ICC more opportunities to qualify.The name "ICC Trophy" has been changed to "ICC World Cup Qualifier".[37]

Under the current qualifying process, the World Cricket League, all 91 Associate and Affiliate members of the ICC are able to qualify for the World Cup. Associate and Affiliate members must play between two and five stages in the ICC World Cricket League to qualify for the World Cup finals, depending on the Division in which they start the qualifying process.


Tournament

The format of the Cricket World Cup has changed greatly over the course of its history. Each of the first four tournaments was played by eight teams, divided into two groups of four.[38] There, competition comprised two stages, a group stage and a knock-out stage. The four teams in each group played each other in the round-robin group stage, with the top two teams in each group progressing to the semi-finals. The winners of the semi-finals played against each other in the final. With the return of South Africa in 1992 after the ending of the apartheid boycott, nine teams played each other once in the group phase, and the top four teams progressed to the semi-finals.[39] The tournament was further expanded in 1996, with two groups of six teams.[40] The top four teams from each group progressed to quarter-finals and semi-finals.

http://www.baggo.com/images/sub/tournamentBracket.jpg

A new format was used for the 1999 and 2003 World Cups. The teams were split into two pools, with the top three teams in each pool advancing to the Super 6.[41] The "Super 6" teams played the three other teams that advanced from the other group. As they advanced, the teams carried their points forward from previous matches against other teams advancing alongside them, giving them an incentive to perform well in the group stages.[41] The top four teams from the "Super 6" stage progressed to the semi-finals, with winners playing in the final.

http://www.hoopdome.com/images/Tournament.jpg

The last format used in the 2007 World Cup, features 16 teams allocated into four groups of four.[42] Within each group, the teams play each other in a round-robin format. Teams earn points for wins and half-points for ties. The top two teams from each group move forward to the Super 8 round. The "Super 8" teams play the other six teams that progressed from the different groups. Teams earned points in the same way as the group stage, but carrying their points forward from previous matches against the other teams who qualified from the same group to the "Super 8" stage.[43] The top four teams from the "Super 8" round advance to the semi-finals, and the winners of the semi-finals play in the final.

The current format, approved by ICC to be used in 2011 World Cup, features 14 teams allocated. Within each group, the teams will play in a round-robin format. The top four teams from each group will proceed to the knock out stage playing quarter-finals. Winners of the quarter-finals will play semi-finals and the winning semi-finalists will play in the final.


Trophy

The ICC Cricket World Cup Trophy is presented to the winners of the World Cup finals. The current trophy was created for the 1999 championships, and was the first permanent prize in the tournament's history; prior to this, different trophies were made for each World Cup.[44] The trophy was designed and produced in London by a team of craftsmen from Garrard & Co over a period of two months.

http://www.irishrugby.ie/images/news/Webb-Ellis-Trophy.jpg

The current trophy is made from silver and gild, and features a golden globe held up by three silver columns. The columns, shaped as stumps and bails, represent the three fundamental aspects of cricket: batting, bowling and fielding, while the globe characterises a cricket ball.[45] The trophy is designed with platonic dimensions, so that it can be easily recognised from any angle. It stands 60 cm high and weighs approximately 11 kilograms. The names of the previous winners are engraved on the base of the trophy, with space for a total of twenty inscriptions.

http://yearbook.uark.edu/blog/uploaded_images/award-trophies-trophy2-788652.jpg

The original trophy is kept by the ICC. A replica, which differs only in the inscriptions, is permanently awarded to the winning team.


Media coverage

http://www.chrisflett.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/updated-media-coverage.png

The tournament is the world's third largest (with only the FIFA World Cup and the Summer Olympics exceeding it), being televised in over 200 countries to over 2.2 billion television viewers.[1][2][46][47] Television rights, mainly for the 2011 and 2015 World Cup, were sold for over US$1.1 billion,[48] and sponsorship rights were sold for a further US$500 million.[49] The 2003 Cricket World Cup matches were attended by 626,845 people,[50] while the 2007 Cricket World Cup sold more than 672,000 tickets and recorded the highest ticketing revenue for a Cricket World Cup.[51][52]

http://www.problogger.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/media-coverage-blog1.jpg

Successive World Cup tournaments have generated increasing media attention as One-Day International cricket has become more established. The 2003 World Cup in South Africa was the first to sport a mascot, Dazzler the zebra. An orange raccoon-like creature known as Mello was the mascot for the 2007 Cricket World Cup.


Selection of hosts

The International Cricket Council's executive committee votes for the hosts of the tournament after examining the bids made by the nations keen to hold a Cricket World Cup.[54]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/66/Cricket_World_Cup_2007.png/220px-Cricket_World_Cup_2007.png

England hosted the first three competitions. The ICC decided that England should host the first tournament because it was ready to devote the resources required to organising the inaugural event.[11] India volunteered to host the third Cricket World Cup, but most ICC members believed England to be a more suitable venue because the longer period of daylight in England in June[55] meant that a match could be completed in one day.[56] The 1987 Cricket World Cup was the first hosted outside England, held in India and Pakistan.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/Civic_Centre-2003_CWC.jpg/220px-Civic_Centre-2003_CWC.jpg

Many of the tournaments have been jointly hosted by nations from the same geographical region, such as South Asia in 1987 and 1996, Australasia in 1992, Southern Africa in 2003 and West Indies in 2007. India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh are going to host the 2011 World Cup. Pakistan was the 4th country involved to host the 2011 World Cup; however, due to security reasons after the March 3, 2009 Lahore terror attacks on the Sri Lankan cricket team bus, the 14 scheduled matches in Pakistan (including one semi-final) have been reassigned to the remaining 3 countries by the ICC executive board. The final for the 2011 world cup will be in Mumbai. Every Test-playing nation now has hosted or co-hosted a Cricket World Cup at least once, except Bangladesh, the most recent country to achieve Test status.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Sports information

10 unnecessary things that every QB does





















Quarterbacks get all the cash money, babes and glory. But while a lot of them dominate on the field, they have more than their fair share of idiotic tendencies. Think about it. Half the time these guys look like complete spazzes. Here are 10 stupid things that quarterbacks do.

10 Point out the Middle Linebacker

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/pointing-out-the-MLB.jpg


pointing out the MLB 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesThe best part of this inane gesture is that I think half of the QBs don’t even know why they are doing it. I remember when Rex Grossman was a Bear he would do it with a puzzled look on his face. Of course, that was his look most of the time, but point is made. Next.


9 Bring Famous Hot Chicks to their Games

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/jessica_simpson.jpg


jessica simpson 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesLook, your whole team and your whole city is depending on you to win the game. Do you really need any added pressure? Great, now you’ll be even more tense because you want to play well for some hottie that you won’t even be dating in a month, and we get 24 cutaway shots per half showing them looking utterly bored. Tell them to watch it on TV.

8 Quiet the Crowd

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/quiet-the-crowd.jpg

quiet the crowd 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesThis is especially true for those genius signal callers that do it on the road. But it doesn’t matter where you are playing, waving your hands up and down isn’t going to make 50,000 nutty fans pipe down. You’re the QB. If you hurled breakfast through your helmet they would cheer. Instead of waving those arms around, spend another two seconds reading that defense, mm-kay?

7 Anything Peyton Manning Does On the Field

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/peyton-manning.jpg


peyton manning 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesHow many times have you watched Manning go through his pre-play shtick at the line and you just wanted to rip his helmet off and slap him silly for about five minutes. Yeah, it works, but it’s aggravating and unnecessary. Half the league and most announcers think he’s just acting out there and not even changing the calls. Ten bucks says as he gets older it will land him on the injury report. And we’ll all laugh.

6 Anything Ben Roethlisberger Does Off the Field

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/ben-roethlisberger-5.jpg


ben roethlisberger 5 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesCrashing motorcycles, getting overly wasted, peeing wherever he sees fit and other possible illegal transgressions make Roethlisberger the current most despised player in the NFL. Even the Steelers fan are sick of him and his troubles. How is he not on the Raiders?

5 Berate the Officials

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/cutler-refs.jpg

cutler refs 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesThat last call didn’t go your way so what did you do? You went all ape and argued about it. But show up the ref on national TV, maybe cuss at him and make a scene — guess what? You’re not getting any calls for the rest of the game either. Don’t be dumb.

4 Audible Into a Worse Play

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/cutler-refs.jpg


audible 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesNot reserved for just the Madden dorks out there, your fave QB does it too. Your dumb QB is calling an audible to a draw play when the safety is creeping into the box. Meanwhile offensive coordinators scream Rex Ryan-like profanities from their booth, which probably smells like unbrushed teeth and fart. Unless you’re Tom Brady or something it’s probably best to go with the OC’s call.

3 Waste Timeouts

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/timeout.jpg


timeout 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesSo let’s get this straight — you just audibled into a run play with eight in the box but because you saw a linebacker pump his hand up and down a few times you thought it was best to go talk it over with the coaching staff? How did you get the starter’s job anyway?

2 Get Photographed While Wasted in Public

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/orton.jpg


orton 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesEli Manning, Big Ben, Jay Cutler and Kyle Orton are just a few of the QBs that have been all over the Internet looking completely wasted. If you can’t handle your booze, take some of your millions and get an actual working member for your entourage — someone that is smart enough to say no to you and big enough to haul your drunk rear end into a car.

1 Nod While Talking to the OC — On the Phone

http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/on-the-phone.jpg

on the phone 135x95 10 unnecessary things that every QB doesIt’s not Skype, bro. You actually have to talk to the guy to let him know what you’re thinking — he can’t see you. And what you’re thinking is probably that you’re going long again next series, even though you’ve thrown three picks already. Enjoy it while it lasts, because you’ll soon be the Mayor of Clipboard City.

Matt Lo Cascio Matt Lo Cascio is a Chicago-based TV/web producer and writer that contributes to many different websites and blogs, including Chicago's MMA, Pippen Ain't Easy and Zoner Sports. His 20-foot jumper is money, even when they decide to guard him.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Fergie Right, But That Misses The Point news and fergie's news

Fergie Right, But That Misses The Point

It probably wouldn't have altered the result, but when Alex Ferguson's decision to leave Wayne Rooney out of the trip to Everton was announced, it was regarded as a Very Serious Matter Indeed. Ferguson had bottled it, Rooney had bottled it, never would've been allowed ten years ago, etc and so on and so forth.

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2010/stylewatch/gallery/denim-poll/fergie.jpg

If Rooney had played, there were basically three possible outcomes:

1) He would've thrived on the pressure, ignored the taunts and put in a blinding performance, reminding us of the pre-Bayern Munich days of last season.

2) He would be cowed and anonymous, afraid of his own shadow and a passenger for most of the 90 minutes. Much as he was for England against Switzerland, goal aside.

3) The abuse/pressure would tip a young man - who is highly strung at the best of times - over the edge, and he would become a walking red card. See the corresponding fixture in 2008, when Rooney was withdrawn, kissing the United badge, before he did something silly. Well, even sillier.

In reality, all three outcomes were as likely as each other, so Ferguson was playing the odds. In any case, Rooney has not been United's outstanding performer this season (he's not even been their outstanding striker), so leaving him out was not as major a decision as it would've been six months ago.

http://www.hollyscoop.com/BlogImages/98262215---brintey.jpg

Still, ignoring a (physically) fit Wayne Rooney is a big call.

Ferguson's reasons, to protect him from the rancid abuse that would no doubt have rained down, may well be the truth. It might have been a convenient excuse to protect a mentally fragile Rooney even further, but that hardly matters.

There ar

e those that will and indeed already have criticised Ferguson for going soft, and encouraged Rooney himself to 'man up'. The argument is always that a footballer is paid an awful lot of money, and should deal with such taunts.

However, this attitude misses the point spectacularly. Why is it taken as a given and accepted that this abuse would be present? The haranguing of a footballer for something that has absolutely nothing to do with his profession is assumed. Nobody questions whether it is acceptable.

http://www.runwaydaily.com/runwaydaily/images/2007/12/10/demi_moore_fergie_and_kerry_washing.jpg

And it absolutely is not. It's not light-hearted banter, it's not fun, and most importantly it is nobody else's business. Without wishing to pre-judge the otherwise excellent Everton support, one assumes the Merseyside air would have been heavy with pious bile, from 40,000 people who no doubt live saintly existences themselves. Even without him on the pitch, there were Rooney songs at Goodison, and some wag took an inflatable doll into the ground with assorted good wishes scrawled all over it.

Those who say Rooney should simply have taken the abuse speak from the fortunate position of never being screamed at about what they may or may not have got up to after hours by a small town's worth of people, after a week's coverage and moralising on the front pages of the most popular newspapers in the country. It's easy to talk theoretically about this sort of thing, knowing you'll never have to be in that situation.

http://images.teamtalk.com/08/10/800x600/Premier-League-trophy1_1270353.jpg


If Rooney had played, and displayed understandable human emotions by reacting (as he is wont to do), he would have been criticised and no doubt punished. It matters not how much a 24-year-old is paid. A stack of cash does not come with a thicker skin. Or at least, a impermeable skin.


Footballers must expect a certain amount of criticism and public attention, but there is a limit, and in an ideal world it would extend only to their performances on the pitch. Obviously, this is not an ideal world, but surely the level of attention and coverage given over to Rooney this week is several giant leaps too far.


Fans complain about over-exposed players and morality in the game, but we have our own role to play. One is not buying newspapers on the basis on salacious gossip, but another is to extend some basic human decency.

Fergie & Ludacris "Glamorous" vs. Flo Rida "Right Round" video



Football news now-Pool Be Much Better and REDS DRAW AGAIN

A Draw, But Shouldn't Pool Be Much Better Than That?


Ouch that was poor. Liverpool were, until the final ten minutes or so, second best by a distance to a gritty Brum outfit that would have won comfortably but for awful finishing and fine saves by Pepe Reina. It hardly helped Pool's cause that Fernando Torres looked fed-up throughout, but then again, can you blame him?

BLUES AND REDS DRAW AGAIN


Liverpool were indebted to a superb display from goalkeeper Jose Reina for earning a point from a goalless draw with Birmingham in their Barclays Premier League clash at St Andrews on Sunday.

http://www.okjordans.com/images/Jordan-7/jordan-7-23.JPG

Reina produced excellent reflex saves to keep out point-blank headers from Cameron Jerome and Craig Gardner to keep out the Blues.

http://uncapp.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/blues-and-reds-11-06-10-fix-2.jpg

They were also left to regret spurning a hat-trick of clear-cut chances and were the more impressive of the two sides but had to settle for a draw, the seventh successive stalemate in this fixture.

On this evidence new Liverpool boss Roy Hodgson has plenty of work to do to make the Merseysiders a force to be reckoned with.

Barry Ferguson and Gardner bossed the midfield while James McFadden and Cameron Jerome linked well up front.

http://www.rogerandpeach.net/.a/6a01156fe8ecb1970c01310f9f8b4f970c-320wi

Reds skipper Steven Gerrard tried to spark his side into life but Fernando Torres still looks short of full sharpness with Scott Dann excellent at the back for Birmingham.

Blues midfielder Ferguson said: "The goalkeeper was outstanding. He made three or four great saves. I think we deserved to win the game, but the goalkeeper was outstanding."
http://sruble.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/sruble_fllkds04.jpg
Team-mate Jerome added: "Pepe is one of the best keepers in the world and it showed. It's one of those things and you take it on the chin."

Blues boss Alex McLeish praised his men, saying: "The players were magnificent. They created four or five chances and we restricted Liverpool and gave some great players very little."

http://www.bergsma.com/artwithheart/photos/full/img_5290.jpg

Reds counterpart Hodgson said: "They played extremely well in the first half.

"We started well but the final 15 minutes before half-time they pressurised the ball well and made life very difficult and we were depending on two very good saves from Pepe Reina.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhi76KSVhwst-2FGlwHGeZYTtOEU06dfjr3A_ek_Oz5GYgR4jyXQz4Q0jCHAHi6e7fhj-YOqehLdKUefS7KU0IdQghFPHBLWvAW3ME14qsMSikxw4jjTNk7HQ4nw9JfJT22mtEivDYIjdE/s400/blue+red+quilt+2.jpg

"But I thought we kept our shape well, kept working at what we were doing, and the longer the game went on the stronger we were getting.

"It was a good performance from Birmingham and I'm not too disappointed with our performance either. We kept to our task well."